Quasi-experimental research design is a widely used methodology in social sciences, education, healthcare, and other fields to evaluate the impact of an intervention or treatment. Unlike true experimental designs, quasi-experiments lack random assignment, which can limit control over external factors but still offer valuable insights into cause-and-effect relationships.
This article delves into the concept of quasi-experimental research, explores its types, methods, and applications, and discusses its strengths and limitations.
Quasi-Experimental Design
Quasi-experimental research design is a type of empirical study used to estimate the causal relationship between an intervention and its outcomes. It resembles an experimental design but does not involve random assignment of participants to groups. Instead, groups are pre-existing or assigned based on non-random criteria, such as location, demographic characteristics, or convenience.
For example, a school might implement a new teaching method in one class while another class continues with the traditional approach. Researchers can then compare the outcomes to assess the effectiveness of the new method.
Is quasi-experimental research quantitative or qualitative?
Quasi-experimental research is a quantitative research method. It involves numerical data collection and statistical analysis. Quasi-experimental research compares groups with different circumstances or treatments to find cause-and-effect links.
It draws statistical conclusions from quantitative data. Qualitative data can enhance quasi-experimental research by revealing participants’ experiences and opinions, but quantitative data is the method’s foundation.
When to use quasi-experimental design
Although true experiments have higher internal validity, you might choose to use a quasi-experimental design for ethical or practical reasons.
Ethical
Sometimes it would be unethical to provide or withhold a treatment on a random basis, so a true experiment is not feasible. In this case, a quasi-experiment can allow you to study the same causal relationship without the ethical issues.
The Oregon Health Study is a good example. It would be unethical to randomly provide some people with health insurance but purposely prevent others from receiving it solely for the purposes of research.
However, since the Oregon government faced financial constraints and decided to provide health insurance via lottery, studying this event after the fact is a much more ethical approach to studying the same problem.
Practical
True experimental design may be infeasible to implement or simply too expensive, particularly for researchers without access to large funding streams.
At other times, too much work is involved in recruiting and properly designing an experimental intervention for an adequate number of subjects to justify a true experiment.
In either case, quasi-experimental designs allow you to study the question by taking advantage of data that has previously been paid for or collected by others (often the government).
Key Characteristics of Quasi-Experimental Research
- No Random Assignment: Participants are not randomly assigned to experimental or control groups.
- Comparison Groups: Often involves comparing a treatment group to a non-equivalent control group.
- Real-World Settings: Frequently conducted in natural environments, such as schools, hospitals, or workplaces.
- Causal Inference: Aims to identify causal relationships, though less robustly than true experiments.
Purpose of Quasi-Experimental Research
- To evaluate interventions or treatments when randomization is impractical or unethical.
- To provide evidence of causality in real-world settings.
- To test hypotheses and inform policies or practices.
Types of Quasi-Experimental Research Design
Many types of quasi-experimental designs exist. There are two reasons why using a quasi-experimental design may be preferable to a true experimental design: ethical or practical. Here we are explaining the most common types:
1. Non-Equivalent Groups Design (NEGD)
In this design, the researcher compares outcomes between a treatment group and a control group that are not randomly assigned.
- Example: Comparing student performance in schools that adopt a new curriculum versus those that do not.
- Limitation: Potential selection bias due to differences between the groups.
2. Time-Series Design
This involves repeatedly measuring the outcome variable before and after the intervention to observe trends over time.
- Example: Monitoring air pollution levels before and after implementing an industrial emission regulation.
- Variation: Interrupted time-series design, which identifies significant changes at specific intervention points.
3. Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)
Participants are assigned to treatment or control groups based on a predetermined cutoff score on a continuous variable.
- Example: Evaluating the effect of a scholarship program where students with test scores above a threshold receive funding.
- Strength: Stronger causal inference compared to other quasi-experimental designs.
4. Pretest-Posttest Design
In this design, outcomes are measured before and after the intervention within the same group.
- Example: Assessing the effectiveness of a training program by comparing employees’ skills before and after the training.
- Limitation: Vulnerable to confounding factors that may influence results independently of the intervention.
5. Propensity Score Matching (PSM)
This method pairs participants in the treatment and control groups based on similar characteristics to reduce selection bias.
- Example: Evaluating the impact of online learning by matching students based on demographics and prior academic performance.
- Strength: Improves comparability between groups.
Differences between quasi-experiments and true experiments
There are several common differences between true and quasi-experimental designs.
| True experimental design | Quasi-experimental design | |
|---|---|---|
| Assignment to treatment | The researcher randomly assigns subjects to control and treatment groups. | Some other, non-random method is used to assign subjects to groups. |
| Control over treatment | The researcher usually designs the treatment. | The researcher often does not have control over the treatment, but instead studies pre-existing groups that received different treatments after the fact. |
| Use of control groups | Requires the use of control and treatment groups. | Control groups are not required (although they are commonly used). |
Example of a true experiment vs a quasi-experiment
- Let’s say you are interested in the impact of a new psychological therapy on patients with depression.Example: True experimental designTo run a true experiment, you randomly assign half the patients in a mental health clinic to receive the new treatment. The other half—the control group—receives the standard course of treatment for depression.
- Every few months, patients fill out a sheet describing their symptoms to see if the new treatment produces significantly better (or worse) effects than the standard one.
- However, for ethical reasons, the directors of the mental health clinic may not give you permission to randomly assign their patients to treatments. In this case, you cannot run a true experiment.
- Instead, you can use a quasi-experimental design.Example: Quasi-experimental designYou discover that a few of the psychotherapists in the clinic have decided to try out the new therapy, while others who treat similar patients have chosen to stick with the normal protocol.
- You can use these pre-existing groups to study the symptom progression of the patients treated with the new therapy versus those receiving the standard course of treatment.
- Although the groups were not randomly assigned, if you properly account for any systematic differences between them, you can be reasonably confident any differences must arise from the treatment and not other confounding variables.
Methods of Quasi-Experimental Research
1. Data Collection
- Surveys: Collect information on attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes related to the intervention.
- Observations: Document changes in natural environments or behaviors over time.
- Archival Data: Use pre-existing data, such as medical records or academic scores, to analyze outcomes.
2. Statistical Analysis
Quasi-experiments rely on statistical techniques to control for confounding variables and enhance the validity of results.
- Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA): Controls for pre-existing differences between groups.
- Regression Analysis: Identifies relationships between the intervention and outcomes while accounting for other factors.
- Propensity Score Matching: Balances treatment and control groups to reduce bias.
3. Control for Confounding Variables
Because randomization is absent, quasi-experimental designs must address confounders using techniques like:
- Matching: Pair participants with similar attributes.
- Stratification: Analyze subgroups based on characteristics like age or income.
- Sensitivity Analysis: Test how robust findings are to potential biases.
4. Use of Mixed Methods
Combining quantitative and qualitative methods enhances the depth of analysis.
- Quantitative: Statistical tests to measure effect size.
- Qualitative: Interviews or focus groups to understand contextual factors influencing outcomes.
Applications of Quasi-Experimental Research
1. Education
- Assessing the impact of new teaching methods or curricula.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of after-school programs on academic performance.
2. Healthcare
- Comparing outcomes of different treatment protocols in hospitals.
- Studying the impact of public health campaigns on vaccination rates.
3. Policy Analysis
- Measuring the effects of new laws or regulations, such as minimum wage increases.
- Evaluating the impact of urban planning initiatives on community health.
4. Social Sciences
- Studying the influence of community programs on crime rates.
- Analyzing the effect of workplace interventions on employee satisfaction.
Strengths of Quasi-Experimental Research
- Feasibility: Can be conducted in real-world settings where randomization is impractical or unethical.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Often requires fewer resources compared to true experiments.
- Flexibility: Accommodates a variety of contexts and research questions.
- Generates Evidence: Provides valuable insights into causal relationships.
Limitations of Quasi-Experimental Research
- Potential Bias: Lack of randomization increases the risk of selection bias.
- Confounding Variables: Results may be influenced by external factors unrelated to the intervention.
- Limited Generalizability: Findings may not apply broadly due to non-random group assignment.
- Weaker Causality: Less robust in establishing causation compared to randomized controlled trials.
Steps to Conduct Quasi-Experimental Research
There are certain situations when research methods using a random assignment would be unethical, such as providing public health care to one group while withholding it from another treatment group.
- Define the Research Question: Clearly articulate what you aim to study and why a quasi-experimental design is appropriate.
- Identify Comparison Groups: Select treatment and control groups based on the research context.
- Collect Data: Use surveys, observations, or archival records to gather pre- and post-intervention data.
- Control for Confounders: Employ statistical methods or matching techniques to address potential biases.
- Analyze Results: Use appropriate statistical tools to evaluate the intervention’s impact.
- Interpret Findings: Discuss results in light of limitations and potential confounding factors.
How to Publish Quasi-Experimental Research?
Publishing your Quasi-Experimental research findings is a crucial step in contributing to the academic community’s knowledge. We’ll explore the essential aspects of reporting and publishing your Quasi-Experimental research effectively.
Structuring Your Research Paper
When preparing your research paper, it’s essential to adhere to a well-structured format to ensure clarity and comprehensibility. Here are key elements to include:
1.Title and Abstract
- Title: Craft a concise and informative title that reflects the essence of your study. It should capture the main research question or hypothesis.
- Abstract: Summarize your research in a structured abstract, including the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Ensure it provides a clear overview of your study.
2.Introduction
- Background and Rationale: Provide context for your study by discussing the research gap or problem your study addresses. Explain why your research is relevant and essential.
- Research Questions or Hypotheses: Clearly state your research questions or hypotheses and their significance.
3.Literature Review
- Review of Related Work: Discuss relevant literature that supports your research. Highlight studies with similar methodologies or findings and explain how your research fits within this context.
4.Methods
- Participants: Describe your study’s participants, including their characteristics and how you recruited them.
- Quasi-Experimental Design: Explain your chosen design in detail, including the independent and dependent variables, procedures, and any control measures taken.
- Data Collection: Detail the data collection methods, instruments used, and any pre-test or post-test measures.
- Data Analysis: Describe the statistical techniques employed, including any control for confounding variables.
6.Results
- Presentation of Findings: Present your results clearly, using tables, graphs, and descriptive statistics where appropriate. Include p-values and effect sizes, if applicable.
- Interpretation of Results: Discuss the implications of your findings and how they relate to your research questions or hypotheses.
7.Discussion
- Interpretation and Implications: Analyze your results in the context of existing literature and theories. Discuss the practical implications of your findings.
- Limitations: Address the limitations of your study, including potential biases or threats to internal validity.
- Future Research: Suggest areas for future research and how your study contributes to the field.
Ethical Considerations in Reporting
Ethical reporting is paramount in Quasi-Experimental research. Ensure that you adhere to ethical standards, including:
- Informed Consent: Clearly state that informed consent was obtained from all participants, and describe the informed consent process.
- Protection of Participants: Explain how you protected the rights and well-being of your participants throughout the study.
- Confidentiality: Detail how you maintained privacy and anonymity, especially when presenting individual data.
- Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Declare any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation of your findings.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
When reporting your Quasi-Experimental research, watch out for common pitfalls that can diminish the quality and impact of your work:
- Overgeneralization: Be cautious not to overgeneralize your findings. Clearly state the limits of your study and the populations to which your results can be applied.
- Misinterpretation of Causality: Clearly articulate the limitations in inferring causality in Quasi-Experimental research. Avoid making strong causal claims unless supported by solid evidence.
- Ignoring Ethical Concerns: Ethical considerations are paramount. Failing to report on informed consent, ethical oversight, and participant protection can undermine the credibility of your study.
Guidelines for Transparent Reporting
To enhance the transparency and reproducibility of your Quasi-Experimental research, consider adhering to established reporting guidelines, such as:
- CONSORT Statement: If your study involves interventions or treatments, follow the CONSORT guidelines for transparent reporting of randomized controlled trials.
- STROBE Statement: For observational studies, the STROBE statement provides guidance on reporting essential elements.
- PRISMA Statement: If your research involves systematic reviews or meta-analyses, adhere to the PRISMA guidelines.
- Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-Randomized Designs (TREND): TREND guidelines offer specific recommendations for transparently reporting non-randomized designs, including Quasi-Experimental research.
By following these reporting guidelines and maintaining the highest ethical standards, you can contribute to the advancement of knowledge in your field and ensure the credibility and impact of your Quasi-Experimental research findings.
REFERENCES
- Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
- Babbie, E. (2020). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
- Thomas, L. (2024, January 22). Quasi-Experimental Design | Definition, Types & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved January 23, 2025, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quasi-experimental-design/
Stories are the threads that bind us; through them, we understand each other, grow, and heal.
JOHN NOORD
Connect with “Nurses Lab Editorial Team”
I hope you found this information helpful. Do you have any questions or comments? Kindly write in comments section. Subscribe the Blog with your email so you can stay updated on upcoming events and the latest articles.
