Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) is an extension of ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) that allows researchers to test the impact of independent variables on multiple dependent variables simultaneously. MANOVA is valuable when a study involves multiple, related outcome variables that are likely influenced by the same factors.
By analyzing these relationships in a single analysis, MANOVA provides a more comprehensive understanding of the effects and interactions of variables.
Multivariate ANOVA formula
MANOVA follows similar analytical steps to the ANOVA method. It involves comparing the means of the outcome variables across each group and quantifying the within- and between-group variance. Some key steps in the calculation are the degrees of freedom (df) of the explanatory variable (the degrees to which the values of an analysis can vary), sum of squares (which summarizes the total variation between the group means and overall mean), the mean of the sum of squares (calculated by dividing the sum of squares by the degrees of freedom).
A step in MANOVA that differs from ANOVA is calculation of the test statistic. There are various test statistics that can be used in MANOVA, each suitable for different situations with regards to overall sample size, group size in the explanatory variable and the assumptions of the test being violated. These include Wilks’ Lambda, Pillai’s trace, Hotelling’s trace and Roy’s largest root. Wilks’ Lambda is most commonly used and so will be the focus of this article.
The formula for the Wilks’ Lambda test statistic in MANOVA is:
Where E is the within-group covariance matrix, which measures variability of the outcome variables within each group of the explanatory variable. A matrix is a set of numbers arranged into rows and columns, and they are commonly used in statistics. T is the totalcovariance matrix, which includes E plus the between-group covariance matrix (H)which measures the variability of the outcome variables between each group of the explanatory variable. Wilks’ Lambda can then be converted to an F statistic to conduct a hypothesis test.
MANOVA vs ANOVA
Let’s consider how ANOVA and MANOVA differ from one another (Table 1).
Table 1: Summary of some key differences between ANOVA and MANOVA.
| Element | ANOVA | MANOVA |
| Covariates | Tests multiple groups of explanatory variable and one outcome variable | Tests multiple groups of explanatory variable and two or more outcome variables |
| Assumptions | Assumptions of normality, independence and variance homogeneity | Assumptions of multivariate normality (for both outcome variables), independence and variance homogeneity (for both outcome variables) |
| Test method | Uses means to calculate variance within and between groups, and an F statistic | As in ANOVA, but calculations done within matrices to deal with the two outcome variables, and an additional step such as Wilks’ Lambda to calculate F statistic |
When to use MANOVA analysis
Wilks’ Lambda: Best suited for small sample sizes or when the assumption of equal covariance matrices is met. It’s the most commonly used test due to its robustness and reliability across various conditions. Use Wilks’ Lambda when your data is well-behaved and follows the assumptions of MANOVA closely.
Pillai’s Trace: Preferred when dealing with unequal sample sizes and violation of assumptions regarding the homogeneity of variances and covariances. Pillai’s Trace is considered the most robust test against violations of these assumptions, making it a safer choice for less ideal datasets.
Hotelling’s Trace: Effective in scenarios where you have a larger sample size and relatively equal group sizes. This test is more sensitive than Wilks’ Lambda to differences between groups. It is beneficial when you expect substantial group differences and have sufficient data to support this analysis.
Roy’s Largest Root (Greatest Characteristic Root): Ideal for situations where the focus is on the largest eigenvalue, and you are interested in the most significant multivariate effect. However, it’s less commonly used due to its sensitivity to violations of assumptions. It is generally recommended when you have a strong rationale for focusing on the principal eigenvalue.
In summary, the choice of test in MANOVA depends on your sample size, group sizes, and the robustness of your data to the assumptions of MANOVA. Wilks’ Lambda is a good general-purpose choice, while Pillai’s Trace offers more robustness against assumption violations. Hotelling’s Trace is suitable for larger, well-balanced datasets, and Roy’s Largest Root is specific for focusing on the most significant multivariate effect.
Understanding Output and Results
After running MANOVA, the output typically includes several vital statistical measures:
- Wilks’ Lambda: A measure of how well each function separates cases into groups. Lower values indicate more group separation.
- Pillai’s Trace: This is another measure of group separation, with higher values indicating more differentiation.
- Hotelling’s Trace and Roy’s Largest Root provide additional insights into group differences.
Each of these measures has an associated F-value and p-value, which indicate the statistical significance of the results. A significant p-value (usually <0.05) suggests significant differences between group means on the combined dependent variables.
Purpose of MANOVA
MANOVA is designed to:
- Test for Differences Across Groups: Determine if there are statistically significant differences among groups based on multiple dependent variables.
- Reduce Type I Error: Control for the increased risk of error that occurs when multiple ANOVA tests are conducted separately.
- Analyze Interactions: Examine if independent variables interact in ways that jointly influence the dependent variables.
- Provide Comprehensive Insight: Offer a holistic view of how a set of dependent variables is influenced by independent variables.
Key Concepts in MANOVA
This technique is particularly useful when researchers want to understand the impact of one or more independent variables on several dependent variables at once, providing a more comprehensive view of the data.
1.Independent Variables:
Variables manipulated or categorized by the researcher, which define the groups being compared (e.g., age groups, treatments).
2.Dependent Variables:
Outcome variables that are measured to assess the effect of the independent variables (e.g., scores on different skills or health outcomes).
3.Covariance:
Since MANOVA involves multiple dependent variables, it accounts for the relationships between these variables to better understand the effects of the independent variable(s).
4.Multivariate Test Statistics:
MANOVA relies on test statistics like Wilks’ Lambda, Pillai’s Trace, Hotelling’s Trace, and Roy’s Largest Root to assess the significance of the findings.
MANOVA Method and Process
A strong statistical method for evaluating the simultaneous effects of one or more independent variables on several dependent variables is a multivariate analysis of variance or MANOVA.
Step 1: Define Research Questions and Hypotheses
Identify the research question(s) and hypotheses. Consider questions involving multiple related outcomes that may vary across groups.
Example: “Does a new teaching method influence both math and reading performance among students?”
Step 2: Ensure Assumptions are Met
MANOVA requires several assumptions to ensure accurate results:
- Normality: The dependent variables should be normally distributed within each group.
- Homogeneity of Variance-Covariance Matrices: Variances of each dependent variable and covariances between pairs of dependent variables should be similar across groups.
- Linearity: Relationships among dependent variables should be linear.
- Absence of Multicollinearity: The dependent variables should be related but not overly correlated.
- Independent Observations: Each observation must be independent from the others.
Step 3: Collect and Organize Data
Gather data that includes measurements for each dependent variable across the groups defined by the independent variable(s).
Example: In a study on physical fitness, data might include measures for flexibility, strength, and endurance across different exercise programs (e.g., yoga, weightlifting, cardio).
Step 4: Conduct the MANOVA Test
Using statistical software like SPSS, R, or SAS:
- Select MANOVA as the analysis method.
- Define the dependent and independent variables in the model.
- Run the analysis to produce multivariate test statistics (e.g., Wilks’ Lambda) and determine if the overall model is statistically significant.
Step 5: Interpret Multivariate Test Results
- Significance of Overall MANOVA Test: Look at the p-value associated with the multivariate test statistic (e.g., Wilks’ Lambda). A significant p-value (typically < 0.05) suggests that the independent variable has a statistically significant effect on the dependent variables as a group.
- Post Hoc Analysis: If the MANOVA is significant, conduct post hoc tests or individual ANOVAs on each dependent variable to determine where differences exist.
- Effect Size: Assess effect sizes (e.g., partial eta squared) to determine the magnitude of the impact.
Assumptions about MANOVA
- Observation Independence: Each participant or observation should be independent of one another. For example, one student’s performance should not influence another’s.
- Multivariate Normality: The combined dependent variables should be approximately normally distributed for each group of the independent variable.
- Homogeneity of Variance-Covariance Matrices: The variance-covariance matrix of the dependent variables should be similar for all groups. This means that the spread and relationship between variables should be consistent across groups.
- Absence of Multicollinearity: The dependent variables should not be too highly correlated. If two variables are very similar, it doesn’t add value to have both.
- Linear Relationships: There should be a linear relationship between each pair of dependent variables for each group of the independent variable.
Examples of MANOVA in Research
Example 1: Education Research
Objective: Determine if a new teaching method impacts both math scores and reading comprehension among elementary students.
- Independent Variable: Teaching Method (Traditional vs. Experimental)
- Dependent Variables: Math Score, Reading Comprehension Score
Method: Conduct MANOVA to test whether there are statistically significant differences in math and reading scores based on the teaching method.
Interpretation: If Wilks’ Lambda indicates a significant effect, this suggests that the teaching method influences math and reading scores jointly. Follow-up tests (individual ANOVAs) can then identify if differences exist for math scores, reading scores, or both.
Example 2: Health Research
Objective: Assess the effects of different exercise programs on cardiovascular health and body flexibility.
- Independent Variable: Exercise Program (Yoga, Running, Weightlifting)
- Dependent Variables: Cardiovascular Fitness Score, Flexibility Score
Method: Use MANOVA to examine if the exercise program affects cardiovascular health and flexibility.
Interpretation: A significant Wilks’ Lambda result would indicate that exercise program type has a combined effect on cardiovascular health and flexibility. If post hoc tests reveal significant differences, this could show, for instance, that yoga improves flexibility significantly more than weightlifting but has similar effects on cardiovascular health.
Example 3: Psychology Research
Objective: Evaluate if a stress-reduction program impacts both stress levels and sleep quality among college students.
- Independent Variable: Program Participation (Program vs. No Program)
- Dependent Variables: Stress Score, Sleep Quality Score
Method: Conduct MANOVA to test the effect of program participation on stress and sleep quality.
Interpretation: If MANOVA results indicate significance, this suggests that the program affects both stress and sleep quality together. Separate ANOVAs can reveal which outcome(s) show significant changes, such as lower stress scores or improved sleep quality in the program group.
Example 4: Marketing Research
Objective: Study the impact of different advertising methods on brand recall and purchase intent.
- Independent Variable: Advertising Type (Social Media, Television, Print)
- Dependent Variables: Brand Recall Score, Purchase Intent Score
Method: Use MANOVA to assess the effect of advertising type on both brand recall and purchase intent.
Interpretation: A significant MANOVA result would suggest that advertising type impacts brand recall and purchase intent as a combined outcome. Post hoc tests might show that social media ads improve brand recall more than print ads, while television ads have the greatest impact on purchase intent.
Advantages of MANOVA
In statistical analysis, Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) provides a number of advantages. They are:
- Simultaneous Testing: By enabling you to compare many dependent variables at once, MANOVA can help lower the possibility of Type I errors that might arise from running individual univariate tests for each variable.
- Efficiency: It effectively condenses intricate correlations between several independent and dependent variables, assisting in the identification of interactions that univariate testing would overlook.
- Reduction of Experiement-Wide Error Rate: MANOVA maintains statistical power by controlling experiment-wise error rates more efficiently by taking into account all dependent variables collectively.
- Improved Interpretability: A deeper comprehension of the data and underlying patterns can be facilitated by using MANOVA, which can shed light on the linkages and interactions between variables.
Disadvantages of MANOVA
Although multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) is a potent statistical approach, it has drawbacks and limitations just like any other technique. The following are a few drawbacks of MANOVA:
- Assumption Stringency: The assumptions of MANOVA are linearity, homogeneity of variance-covariance matrices between groups, and multivariate normality. Results that are not trustworthy may arise from breaking these presumptions.
- Complexity: Performing and interpreting a MANOVA can be challenging, particularly for researchers who are not familiar with multivariate statistics. It necessitates a solid grasp of the data and the methodology.
- Difficulty in Post-Hoc Testing: Because several dependent variables in a MANOVA are interdependent, doing post-hoc tests might be difficult. It may be challenging to determine which particular group differences are noteworthy due to this intricacy.
- Multiple Testing: If necessary adjustments are not done, there is a higher chance of Type I errors (false positives) when analyzing the impact of several independent variables or performing post-hoc testing
Tips for Conducting MANOVA
- Check Assumptions: Before running MANOVA, ensure that assumptions (normality, linearity, and homogeneity) are tested and met to avoid biased results.
- Use Appropriate Sample Size: MANOVA requires a relatively large sample size to ensure reliable results and meet assumptions.
- Consider Follow-Up Tests: Use post hoc or individual ANOVAs on significant findings to identify specific differences between groups and interpret outcomes more effectively.
- Interpret Multivariate Statistics Carefully: Consider each test statistic (e.g., Wilks’ Lambda, Pillai’s Trace) and determine the best approach for your study.
REFERENCES
- Amouzadeh, Tooba & Arjmandnia, Ali. (2023). MANOVA: Multivariate analysis of variance. 10.13140/RG.2.2.29070.74566.
- Lars St»hle, Svante Wold, Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Volume 9, Issue 2, 1990, Pages 127-141, ISSN 0169-7439, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(90)80094-M.
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (5th ed.). Routledge.
- Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods (6th ed.). Routledge.
- https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/manova-test-in-machine-learning/
Stories are the threads that bind us; through them, we understand each other, grow, and heal.
JOHN NOORD
Connect with “Nurses Lab Editorial Team”
I hope you found this information helpful. Do you have any questions or comments? Kindly write in comments section. Subscribe the Blog with your email so you can stay updated on upcoming events and the latest articles.
